I am trying to call belgium and i am in afghanistan currently. it says to use +32 and the area code and number
i found another site that said use your international access code which is 00 and the country code and the city code. how do i dial belgium? it is not working i keep getting error messages and also it rang once forever and her answering machine did not pick up so i do not think it was calling her. i am lost.
Belgium - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I knew for sure that Belgium was indeed country code 32, but I didn't know the international dialing code for Afghanistan (not so commonly used :0)) Anyway, http://www.kropla.com/dialcode.htm shows that the Int'l dialing code is correct as 00, One thing that tends to get forgotten is that you have to drop the zero for the local code. So say your number is 016 33 22 xx, then from afghanistan you would dial 00 32 16 33 22 xx Hope this helps
2 :
The country code of Belgium is 32. The acess code (the +) is 00 If you have a telephonenumber in Belgium you must drop the 0. ex. Bruges: 050 51 33 50 (mister Smith) = 50 51 33 50 So when you call from Afghanistan to mister Smith you make 003250513350 Good luck
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Help answer these questions on Belgian Culture please!
Help answer these questions on Belgian Culture please!!!!?
1.Who are Belgium's heroes and heroines? 2.What is the typical attitude of a Belgian toward trash and litter in public? Are cities usually very clean? 3.Are many Belgians religious? How important is religion in public life in Belgium? How important are religious holidays, and do people in Belgium generally observe them? 4.What is the typical attitude towards gambling, drinking, and drugs in Belgium? 5.What times during the day are meals usually eaten? Which meal is the most important? Do families eat together? 6.What is the usual dress for someone going to school or work in Belgium? 7.If you are invited for dinner, would you be expected to arrive early, exactly on time, or a bit late? 8.To what events is one expected to bring gifts? What types of gifts are appropriate? 9.How do people greet and say goodbye to one another? 10.What things do children, teenagers, and adults do for fun? 11.What are the most important holidays? How does the typical person in Belgium celebrate these holidays? 12.What is the general attitude towards beggars and the homeless? Are there many homeless people in the cities? 13.What are the most popular television shows for children, teenagers, and adults? 14.How are children usually disciplined? Do parents typically use physical punishments? 15.What things are taboo in Belgium? 16.What types of rules are there in schools and universities in Belgium? 17.How is a Belgian student expected to behave in class? How does he or she address the professor? 18.How are classes taught? How large are university classes? 19.What types of assignments are given in universities?
Other - Cultures & Groups - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Right. First my background so you know where I am coming from. I was born and raised in Belgium and have now lived in England for a couple of years. So, as I don't know your background, I shall use English culture to compare Belgian culture with, though i must say that in many of the aspects you are asking about, Britain is pretty bad, so Belgium is automatically going to be better. 1. The most revered Belgian would be Father Damien. He topped the list of Greatest Belgian ever. This is a reliable poll. The complete list you can find on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Grootste_Belg . I would point you in the direction of these people in the list that are very revered, as opposed to just famous Belgians: number 1, 3, 5 and 16, the previous Belgian monarch. Read up on their lives on wikipedia too, especially Father Damien is worthwhile. (I want to keep it as short as possible here) 2. I would say Belgian has more of a greener attitude than Britain, definitely. There are always a few seats in parliament taken up by the Green party, they have even made it into the government coalition a few times. Recycling is encouraged and done by many. Most cities are very clean and attract many tourists for their medieval buildings. 3. The national religion as it were, is catholicism. Just like in all countries, the amount of devout religious people has declined since the sixties, but most people would still classify themselves as catholic if you'd ask them, even that means that they just go for marriages, baptism, funerals, first holy communions and confirmations. Especially the over-70s are still very devout catholicists, attending church regularly. There are nationally observed religious holidays apart from the Easter and Christmas related ones, such as 1 November, All Saints Day, when traditionally people remember those who have passed away. 4. Pretty much the same like other countries: some abhor it, some do it. I would say it's not as bad as England, but it's not very good in England. There is definitely less youths binge-drinking, but drugs might be more prominent than in England. I don't know, i've never been in those environments. 5. Three times a day, like other countries. I would say families do eat together much more than in England, where so many people eat separately or ready-made-meals in front of television. I think the art of cooking is still actively being passed on mother-to-daughter in Belgium. 6. Whatever the fashion. Pretty much the same as everywhere else in the world. Belgium may be small, but it ain't like Borat's version of Kazachstan. Ha. Ha. 7. A bit late. The polite late. 8. Gifts are always appropriate. A bottle of wine is never out of place. Don't buy embarrisingly expensive gifts! 9. Ah now the greetings and farewells. Three, yes, three kisses on the cheeks. I think it's left right left or whatever. Guy to guy: handshakes of course, not kisses, not like in Italy. Let them lean in first was always my approach. 10. Whatever they feel like. pff. The same like any western European country. Oh, Belgians, like the Dutch, do like a good cycling trip for recreation though. 11. You have Christmas and Easter and then there is Saint Nicholas (6 December). This is very popular among children. Saint Nicholas on the night of 5 to 6/12 brings gifts for the children that have been good. In reality of course, the gifts are put in the living room by their parents as the children sleep. I'd say this lasts upto maximum when they are 12 years of age, and they may have worked it out by then. If you want to read more about this, visit wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinterklaas. Some corners of Belgium celebrate St Martin (11 November) in stead, as he is the local patron saint. As a consequence, he (st martin or nicholas) takes the role of what Santa Clause is in America and the UK on Christmas day. Belgians do give presents on Christmas, but there is less emphasis on the Santa Clause idea, though he does "come". Easter- the usual, chocolate bunnies and eggs. 12. They are generally kept of the streets from what i have seen. Belgium seems a pretty wealthy country relatively, thinking about it. The attitude? Depends on the people. I'd say compassionate, but also prudent (if you give money to them, what are they gonna spend it on? Drink?) 13. I have been away too long to know what's currently popular on television, though the tour de France and other cycling competitions are always nationally televised and are relatively popular, to name but one difference with England, where road cycling is not popular at all. 14. However they feel like disciplining. It depends on the parents, but as in many rich countries, there is an increasing number of parents that do not want to physically strike their children and some people never say no to their children and spoil them to bits, to their own detriment. Social services are quite active as well - you need to be careful if you smack your children a
1.Who are Belgium's heroes and heroines? 2.What is the typical attitude of a Belgian toward trash and litter in public? Are cities usually very clean? 3.Are many Belgians religious? How important is religion in public life in Belgium? How important are religious holidays, and do people in Belgium generally observe them? 4.What is the typical attitude towards gambling, drinking, and drugs in Belgium? 5.What times during the day are meals usually eaten? Which meal is the most important? Do families eat together? 6.What is the usual dress for someone going to school or work in Belgium? 7.If you are invited for dinner, would you be expected to arrive early, exactly on time, or a bit late? 8.To what events is one expected to bring gifts? What types of gifts are appropriate? 9.How do people greet and say goodbye to one another? 10.What things do children, teenagers, and adults do for fun? 11.What are the most important holidays? How does the typical person in Belgium celebrate these holidays? 12.What is the general attitude towards beggars and the homeless? Are there many homeless people in the cities? 13.What are the most popular television shows for children, teenagers, and adults? 14.How are children usually disciplined? Do parents typically use physical punishments? 15.What things are taboo in Belgium? 16.What types of rules are there in schools and universities in Belgium? 17.How is a Belgian student expected to behave in class? How does he or she address the professor? 18.How are classes taught? How large are university classes? 19.What types of assignments are given in universities?
Other - Cultures & Groups - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Right. First my background so you know where I am coming from. I was born and raised in Belgium and have now lived in England for a couple of years. So, as I don't know your background, I shall use English culture to compare Belgian culture with, though i must say that in many of the aspects you are asking about, Britain is pretty bad, so Belgium is automatically going to be better. 1. The most revered Belgian would be Father Damien. He topped the list of Greatest Belgian ever. This is a reliable poll. The complete list you can find on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Grootste_Belg . I would point you in the direction of these people in the list that are very revered, as opposed to just famous Belgians: number 1, 3, 5 and 16, the previous Belgian monarch. Read up on their lives on wikipedia too, especially Father Damien is worthwhile. (I want to keep it as short as possible here) 2. I would say Belgian has more of a greener attitude than Britain, definitely. There are always a few seats in parliament taken up by the Green party, they have even made it into the government coalition a few times. Recycling is encouraged and done by many. Most cities are very clean and attract many tourists for their medieval buildings. 3. The national religion as it were, is catholicism. Just like in all countries, the amount of devout religious people has declined since the sixties, but most people would still classify themselves as catholic if you'd ask them, even that means that they just go for marriages, baptism, funerals, first holy communions and confirmations. Especially the over-70s are still very devout catholicists, attending church regularly. There are nationally observed religious holidays apart from the Easter and Christmas related ones, such as 1 November, All Saints Day, when traditionally people remember those who have passed away. 4. Pretty much the same like other countries: some abhor it, some do it. I would say it's not as bad as England, but it's not very good in England. There is definitely less youths binge-drinking, but drugs might be more prominent than in England. I don't know, i've never been in those environments. 5. Three times a day, like other countries. I would say families do eat together much more than in England, where so many people eat separately or ready-made-meals in front of television. I think the art of cooking is still actively being passed on mother-to-daughter in Belgium. 6. Whatever the fashion. Pretty much the same as everywhere else in the world. Belgium may be small, but it ain't like Borat's version of Kazachstan. Ha. Ha. 7. A bit late. The polite late. 8. Gifts are always appropriate. A bottle of wine is never out of place. Don't buy embarrisingly expensive gifts! 9. Ah now the greetings and farewells. Three, yes, three kisses on the cheeks. I think it's left right left or whatever. Guy to guy: handshakes of course, not kisses, not like in Italy. Let them lean in first was always my approach. 10. Whatever they feel like. pff. The same like any western European country. Oh, Belgians, like the Dutch, do like a good cycling trip for recreation though. 11. You have Christmas and Easter and then there is Saint Nicholas (6 December). This is very popular among children. Saint Nicholas on the night of 5 to 6/12 brings gifts for the children that have been good. In reality of course, the gifts are put in the living room by their parents as the children sleep. I'd say this lasts upto maximum when they are 12 years of age, and they may have worked it out by then. If you want to read more about this, visit wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinterklaas. Some corners of Belgium celebrate St Martin (11 November) in stead, as he is the local patron saint. As a consequence, he (st martin or nicholas) takes the role of what Santa Clause is in America and the UK on Christmas day. Belgians do give presents on Christmas, but there is less emphasis on the Santa Clause idea, though he does "come". Easter- the usual, chocolate bunnies and eggs. 12. They are generally kept of the streets from what i have seen. Belgium seems a pretty wealthy country relatively, thinking about it. The attitude? Depends on the people. I'd say compassionate, but also prudent (if you give money to them, what are they gonna spend it on? Drink?) 13. I have been away too long to know what's currently popular on television, though the tour de France and other cycling competitions are always nationally televised and are relatively popular, to name but one difference with England, where road cycling is not popular at all. 14. However they feel like disciplining. It depends on the parents, but as in many rich countries, there is an increasing number of parents that do not want to physically strike their children and some people never say no to their children and spoil them to bits, to their own detriment. Social services are quite active as well - you need to be careful if you smack your children a
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Could I follow a Master Degree in Nursing in the US
Could I follow a Master Degree in Nursing in the US?
I am a midwife in Belgium and am currently working as a qualified nurse. My husband has been offered a job for two years in the US as an ex patriot. Would it be possible for me the take a Master in Nursing even though I am a midwife? Also would it be possible to work as a nurse while taking this course?
Health Care - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You will first need to contact the state board of nursing where you will be living to see if you are eligible for Registered Nurse licensure. There are many regulations surrounding foreign-educated nurses and your school's program needs to be reviewed to determine if you meet all the same educational standards as a US educated RN. As for school and pursuing a master's degree, that is another issue where the school records office would need to review your transcripts to determine if you qualify for entry. So the bottom line is, nobody here can tell you much of anything, you'll need to contact the board of nursing and these universities and begin the process. Good luck to you!
2 :
Jill's answer is perfect. I did just want to add, that in the US, midwives are required to have the Master of Science in Nursing, so you could not work as a midwife in the US.
I am a midwife in Belgium and am currently working as a qualified nurse. My husband has been offered a job for two years in the US as an ex patriot. Would it be possible for me the take a Master in Nursing even though I am a midwife? Also would it be possible to work as a nurse while taking this course?
Health Care - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You will first need to contact the state board of nursing where you will be living to see if you are eligible for Registered Nurse licensure. There are many regulations surrounding foreign-educated nurses and your school's program needs to be reviewed to determine if you meet all the same educational standards as a US educated RN. As for school and pursuing a master's degree, that is another issue where the school records office would need to review your transcripts to determine if you qualify for entry. So the bottom line is, nobody here can tell you much of anything, you'll need to contact the board of nursing and these universities and begin the process. Good luck to you!
2 :
Jill's answer is perfect. I did just want to add, that in the US, midwives are required to have the Master of Science in Nursing, so you could not work as a midwife in the US.
Could I follow a Master Degree in Nursing in the US
Could I follow a Master Degree in Nursing in the US?
I am a midwife in Belgium and am currently working as a qualified nurse. My husband has been offered a job for two years in the US as an ex patriot. Would it be possible for me the take a Master in Nursing even though I am a midwife? Also would it be possible to work as a nurse while taking this course?
Health Care - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You will first need to contact the state board of nursing where you will be living to see if you are eligible for Registered Nurse licensure. There are many regulations surrounding foreign-educated nurses and your school's program needs to be reviewed to determine if you meet all the same educational standards as a US educated RN. As for school and pursuing a master's degree, that is another issue where the school records office would need to review your transcripts to determine if you qualify for entry. So the bottom line is, nobody here can tell you much of anything, you'll need to contact the board of nursing and these universities and begin the process. Good luck to you!
2 :
Jill's answer is perfect. I did just want to add, that in the US, midwives are required to have the Master of Science in Nursing, so you could not work as a midwife in the US.
I am a midwife in Belgium and am currently working as a qualified nurse. My husband has been offered a job for two years in the US as an ex patriot. Would it be possible for me the take a Master in Nursing even though I am a midwife? Also would it be possible to work as a nurse while taking this course?
Health Care - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You will first need to contact the state board of nursing where you will be living to see if you are eligible for Registered Nurse licensure. There are many regulations surrounding foreign-educated nurses and your school's program needs to be reviewed to determine if you meet all the same educational standards as a US educated RN. As for school and pursuing a master's degree, that is another issue where the school records office would need to review your transcripts to determine if you qualify for entry. So the bottom line is, nobody here can tell you much of anything, you'll need to contact the board of nursing and these universities and begin the process. Good luck to you!
2 :
Jill's answer is perfect. I did just want to add, that in the US, midwives are required to have the Master of Science in Nursing, so you could not work as a midwife in the US.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
If a country falls apart, how would that work
If a country falls apart, how would that work?
My country - Belgium - has been stuck in governmental talks for months and no end in sight. There has always been tension between the French and Dutch part and it seems to be becoming less and less solveable. So say both sides want to be shot of each other but there is no actual armed conflict, would / could the country just be split in two? Does that make two new countries? How would that work internationally? As much info as possible thanks. Forget letting the people decide, government has railroaded round every decision the people have made these last twenty years.
Other - Politics & Government - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
It's pretty unlikely for a country to peacefully split into two parts. In most cases, there will be resources in the other 'new' countries region that both 'new' countries will want, and neither will want to give up. Then the killing starts.
2 :
Put it to a nation wide VOTE.....let the people decide.
3 :
It can happen. An example to read up on is the former Yugoslavia which has now become Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, Kosovo and Macedonia. This was not peaceful by any means but it is a precendent. You can declare a new country, the process would then be to become "recognised" by the international community by gaining their support, which is not necessarily easy. This is not like a law or anything but unless you have the support of the international community it could be difficult to trade with other countries which is vital in todays world. In the case of Yugoslavia the international community was involved in the breakup and rebuilding of the country so the recognitions were much easier to come by. But as i said, recognition is not really an official process to which there are rules. Perhaps a formal aspect would be acceptance into the United Nations (UN) but this is more of a government recognition rather than a nation. The main problem would come from getting internal agreement to the change What makes this whole topic difficult to explain in a forum like this though are the many many issues involved in seperating a country which almost invariably leads to conflict. For instance how would you divide belgium geographically? invariably though a general divide might exist the population will in some way be mixed up, this means you would have to clear the dutch people out of the French sections, probably against many peoples will. This is called "ethnic cleansing" which is a crime in international law. This is exactly what happened in yugoslavia which is why it was such a terrible, terrible mess leading to one of the genocides of the 20th century. And we have even started talking about resource allocation yet, most wars are fought over who gets control of natural resources - Think iraq and the kuwait region. Kuwait has most of the oil and wanted to break away and form its own country with the result that Saddam Hussein gassed thousands of villagers because he was so desperate to maintain control of the the richest parts of the country. Currently think Israel and palestine where no one can agree how a palestinian state would work. Country seperation is theoretically possible if both sides simply agreed to do it (and by that i mean ALL the people of the current nation). And if this was done i can't see the international community being too adverse to it. But in reality the road is fraught with a thousand difficulties- its never going to be simple you can rest assured...
4 :
well in the oldendays conflics like this would be settled by civil war. but as youre discussing belgium here. i would say that is very very unlikely. usually when the civil war ends, a peace is signed and borders are drawn. In most cases however, in more modern history, the UN interveins in civil wars. to protect the peace. (think of yugoslavia.) the countries wouldnt realy become countries unless a government is established. and this government is backed. this could either be by a military pressence large enough to defend the country, or by a government that is backed internationally, either by the un or a powerful neighbouring state. but since europe has been a very stable region over the last 50 years, this is very unlikely. Stately reforms have been in discussion since the forming of belgium. and mostly this is towards some autonomy or 2 headed state. the negotiations always strand on deciding who takes brussels, which is bi-lingual. as is, it does not realy matter. belgium is already in the european union, and splitting the country isnt realy an option. what would that mean to the european ideal of setting aside out differences? when the country that houses the capitol of the union, splits in two?
5 :
If Belgium was to split in 2 then there wouldn't be an open war, but the economic, social and culture effects would cause more damage then war. Social security, medical care, etc. All this would be destroyed and these systems are amongst the best, if not the best in the world. The whole Belgian system has been constructed by the wallons and the Flemish in 150y and everything would be gone in a matter of months. That's why none of the Belgian politicians will ever allow that Belgium be split in half. Except maybe Dewinter but I hate that freak of nature. Belgium has been the example of a country that can work politically, even with 3 language communities, cause some forget that the German community also has a say in this, even though they have to vote for Wallon parties. The 3 have always learned that they need each other, When the Wallons were the most powerfull 100y ago they knew that without the Flemish they were nothing. Now the Flemish have to see that without the Wallons they are nothing. When the mines and factories closed in Wallonia, the whole central of power shifted to Flanders. (The German part isn't that important in the history of belgium cause it was given to them after the second world war. They came smack in the middle of the change of power.) Now Flanders still is the richest, most developed, and attractive part of Belgium but without the Wallons they have nothing. The social and cultural system doesn't allow them to be split, if they do they could end up destroying everything they built. And if they really want to split they will take their time and try to find a sollution that doesn't affect their social system. So don't fear a separation just yet. Only when they feel ready and have a safe way of going their separate way, then they'll do so. Vive la republic. Hehe, always fun to say that.
My country - Belgium - has been stuck in governmental talks for months and no end in sight. There has always been tension between the French and Dutch part and it seems to be becoming less and less solveable. So say both sides want to be shot of each other but there is no actual armed conflict, would / could the country just be split in two? Does that make two new countries? How would that work internationally? As much info as possible thanks. Forget letting the people decide, government has railroaded round every decision the people have made these last twenty years.
Other - Politics & Government - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
It's pretty unlikely for a country to peacefully split into two parts. In most cases, there will be resources in the other 'new' countries region that both 'new' countries will want, and neither will want to give up. Then the killing starts.
2 :
Put it to a nation wide VOTE.....let the people decide.
3 :
It can happen. An example to read up on is the former Yugoslavia which has now become Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, Kosovo and Macedonia. This was not peaceful by any means but it is a precendent. You can declare a new country, the process would then be to become "recognised" by the international community by gaining their support, which is not necessarily easy. This is not like a law or anything but unless you have the support of the international community it could be difficult to trade with other countries which is vital in todays world. In the case of Yugoslavia the international community was involved in the breakup and rebuilding of the country so the recognitions were much easier to come by. But as i said, recognition is not really an official process to which there are rules. Perhaps a formal aspect would be acceptance into the United Nations (UN) but this is more of a government recognition rather than a nation. The main problem would come from getting internal agreement to the change What makes this whole topic difficult to explain in a forum like this though are the many many issues involved in seperating a country which almost invariably leads to conflict. For instance how would you divide belgium geographically? invariably though a general divide might exist the population will in some way be mixed up, this means you would have to clear the dutch people out of the French sections, probably against many peoples will. This is called "ethnic cleansing" which is a crime in international law. This is exactly what happened in yugoslavia which is why it was such a terrible, terrible mess leading to one of the genocides of the 20th century. And we have even started talking about resource allocation yet, most wars are fought over who gets control of natural resources - Think iraq and the kuwait region. Kuwait has most of the oil and wanted to break away and form its own country with the result that Saddam Hussein gassed thousands of villagers because he was so desperate to maintain control of the the richest parts of the country. Currently think Israel and palestine where no one can agree how a palestinian state would work. Country seperation is theoretically possible if both sides simply agreed to do it (and by that i mean ALL the people of the current nation). And if this was done i can't see the international community being too adverse to it. But in reality the road is fraught with a thousand difficulties- its never going to be simple you can rest assured...
4 :
well in the oldendays conflics like this would be settled by civil war. but as youre discussing belgium here. i would say that is very very unlikely. usually when the civil war ends, a peace is signed and borders are drawn. In most cases however, in more modern history, the UN interveins in civil wars. to protect the peace. (think of yugoslavia.) the countries wouldnt realy become countries unless a government is established. and this government is backed. this could either be by a military pressence large enough to defend the country, or by a government that is backed internationally, either by the un or a powerful neighbouring state. but since europe has been a very stable region over the last 50 years, this is very unlikely. Stately reforms have been in discussion since the forming of belgium. and mostly this is towards some autonomy or 2 headed state. the negotiations always strand on deciding who takes brussels, which is bi-lingual. as is, it does not realy matter. belgium is already in the european union, and splitting the country isnt realy an option. what would that mean to the european ideal of setting aside out differences? when the country that houses the capitol of the union, splits in two?
5 :
If Belgium was to split in 2 then there wouldn't be an open war, but the economic, social and culture effects would cause more damage then war. Social security, medical care, etc. All this would be destroyed and these systems are amongst the best, if not the best in the world. The whole Belgian system has been constructed by the wallons and the Flemish in 150y and everything would be gone in a matter of months. That's why none of the Belgian politicians will ever allow that Belgium be split in half. Except maybe Dewinter but I hate that freak of nature. Belgium has been the example of a country that can work politically, even with 3 language communities, cause some forget that the German community also has a say in this, even though they have to vote for Wallon parties. The 3 have always learned that they need each other, When the Wallons were the most powerfull 100y ago they knew that without the Flemish they were nothing. Now the Flemish have to see that without the Wallons they are nothing. When the mines and factories closed in Wallonia, the whole central of power shifted to Flanders. (The German part isn't that important in the history of belgium cause it was given to them after the second world war. They came smack in the middle of the change of power.) Now Flanders still is the richest, most developed, and attractive part of Belgium but without the Wallons they have nothing. The social and cultural system doesn't allow them to be split, if they do they could end up destroying everything they built. And if they really want to split they will take their time and try to find a sollution that doesn't affect their social system. So don't fear a separation just yet. Only when they feel ready and have a safe way of going their separate way, then they'll do so. Vive la republic. Hehe, always fun to say that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)